Our CSV & CSA Expertise
A pragmatic approach to demonstrate fitness for intended use and maintain the compliance of your GxP systems.
Poorly suited or insufficiently validated systems expose your organisation to quality, compliance and business continuity risks.
Comprehensive, pragmatic expertise tailored to your systems and your context.
GxP applicability, classification and validation plan.
This first step determines whether the system falls within GxP scope and builds a CSV/CSA strategy proportionate to its criticality, complexity and level of configuration.
System Impact Assessment, validation strategy, validation plan, responsibility matrix and activity schedule.
URS, critical functions and risk analyses.
We help you formalise clear, verifiable user requirements suited to the system's intended use.
Risk analysis then identifies the functions and data requiring the highest level of control. Requirements, risks and tests are thus linked in a coherent, traceable approach.
URS, risk analysis, critical function register, acceptance criteria and traceability matrix.
Assessing vendors and using their evidence.
Using a Cloud or SaaS solution does not transfer regulatory responsibility to the vendor.
We assess the vendor's capabilities, the services offered and the available documentation to determine what evidence can be used and what checks must remain your responsibility.
Supplier questionnaire, Supplier Assessment, audit report, gap analysis and responsibility matrix.
Verify critical functions and preserve data integrity.
We define and carry out verification activities centred on the system's intended use and risks.
When the project includes a migration, we also verify that transferred data remains complete, accurate, consistent, traceable and interpretable in the target system.
Test protocols and scenarios, execution evidence, defect reports, traceability matrix, migration protocol and verification report.
Changes, incidents, periodic reviews and requalifications.
We help you embed the necessary controls into routine activities and assess the impact of changes, incidents and new versions.
Procedures, impact analyses, test plans, periodic review reports, remediation plans and requalification reports.
Discuss maintaining your validated stateFocus evidence on what is critical, leverage supplier knowledge and tailor testing to risk.
CSA doesn't mean less control — it means better-targeted assurance.
We work across all critical systems in your GxP activities.
A structured, pragmatic approach, from the operational context to long-term sustainability.
No. An assessment determines whether the system is involved in a GxP activity and what level of validation is required based on its use and risks.
CSV (Computerized System Validation) refers to the overall validation approach. CSA (Computer Software Assurance) reinforces the use of critical thinking and assurance activities proportionate to risk. It removes neither validation nor documented evidence.
The approach should cover intended use, configuration, interfaces, data integrity, access, vendor responsibilities, version changes and reversibility.
Engagements can be combined depending on your starting point. An initial conversation helps scope the work.
Get in touch